|
|
|
About
the Motivation Assessment Scale
The Functional
Approach
"Despite all of our best efforts,
a large number of people who have severe disabilities continue
to display serious and disruptive behavior problems...
All of us would prefer to use only
positive treatments for these behavior problems... [M]ost people
involved in this field today recommend that a functional analysis
be carried out before any treatment. The idea behind the functional
analysis is to see why the person is misbehaving...A teacher
might give a student difficult class work for 5 minutes, easy
work for 5 minutes, then difficult work for 5 minutes to see
if the student was more disruptive during different types of
tasks. Similarly, parents or evening staff could alternate nights
of giving or withholding nighttime snacks to see if these treats
are having an effect on problems around bedtime..."
|
Practical Problems
"Several problems come up when trying
to discover why someone is misbehaving using a functional analysis...For
example, as we just described, a teacher could change the difficulty
of tasks to see if this changes a students behavior problem.
But what if the student then hits another student when he is
upset? What if he hurts himself? Is the information from such
an assessment worth the risk of injury?
"Another problem...is knowing where to
look...Unfortunately, in the past, little help has been available
to assist in selecting among the infinite number of things that
might be causing certain behavior problems."
|
The MAS
"We have developed the Motivation
Assessment Scale (MAS) as an additional way to find out why peoples
problem behaviors persist by assessing the influence of social
attention, tangibles, escape, and sensory consequences on problem
behavior. The MAS is a sixteen item questionnaire that assesses
the functions or motivations of behavior problems. The sixteen
items are organized into four categories of reinforcement (attention,
tangible, escape, and sensory) described in the previous section.
The MAS asks questions about the likelihood of a behavior problem
occurring in a variety of situations (e.g., when presented with
difficult tasks).
"In addition, using this scale
does not involve making behavior problems worse, a feature that
has obvious advantages. It is hoped that through the use of the
MAS, people with severe behavior problems will have greater access
to positive interventions."
|
Research on
the MAS
"One question that is often asked when
discussing the Motivation Assessment Scale has to do with its
necessity. Would simply asking teachers, parents, or others if
an individuals problem behavior was maintained by attention,
escape, tangibles, or sensory consequences yield the same information
as a full administration of the scale? In order to answer this
question, we asked the teachers in a previous study to rank the
four classes of maintaining variables for their possible influence
on the individuals self-injurious behaviors (Durand &
Crimmins, 1988). We observed that these rankings did not correlate
significantly with the teachers MAS scores. Therefore,
although teachers could predict an individuals self-injurious
behavior through their answers on the Motivation Assessment Scale,
their global ratings of controlling variables were not as accurate.
Guessing why individuals may misbehave may be helpful in order
to generate hypotheses, but it is always important to follow
up your guesses with more formal assessments." |
|