Image 1
About the MAS
MAS Case Study
Influences on Behavior and the MAS
About the Authors
Scoring & Interpretation of MAS Results
Use the
MAS on the Web
iMAS
 MASSoftware 3.0 for Windows
 Regular Use, Duplication, Research, Site Licenses
Ordering
MAS Home
Feedback for Monaco & Associates

© 1996-2001 Monaco & Associates Incorporated.

Motivation Assessment Scale by Durand and Crimmins


Scoring and Interpretation of
Motivation Assessment Scale Results

By V. Mark Durand, Ph.D., and Daniel B. Crimmins, Ph.D.
Reprinted from The Motivation Assessment Scale Administration Guide

Scoring

"If one category (e.g., Escape) has clearly received the highest score, then it is assumed that this is the most important influence on the behavior. We are less interested in the total score (e.g., total score = 20) or the mean score (e.g., mean score = 5.00) than we are in the relative rank (e.g., relative ranking = 1)..."

 Score Interpretation: Ties

"If more than two categories are given high scores, it may be that the MAS wasn’t completed properly...take another look at the behavior being assessed and at the setting selected. Remember that if the behavior you selected includes several different behaviors...or if you try to include too many settings (e.g., looking at the whole school day versus individual seatwork) then you may get confusing results.

"If there is a tie for the highest score or if the means of the top two categories are within .25 to .50 points (and you have clearly specified the behavior and setting), then both are considered as influences that may be causing the problem behavior to continue..."

Designing a Treatment

"The information from the MAS may indicate problems in the home, school, or work setting. If someone is scoring high on the Escape category, things may be too demanding (i.e., the work may be too difficult) or too sterile (boring) and, therefore, uninteresting. To develop an effective treatment for escape-motivated behavior, start by considering what it is that the person is trying to escape from. High scores on the Attention category may indicate that too little attention is available. You will want to consider what can be done to make attention more readily and appropriately available. High scores on the Tangible category could mean that reasonable requests (e.g., wanting snacks, or a change in activities) are being ignored. You will find yourself asking "What can be done so that these requests do not go unnoticed?" Since high scores on the Sensory category could indicate that the environment itself is not stimulating enough, you will want to determine what can be done to enrich the environment...

"Problem behavior can be reduced and very often eliminated by teaching alternative behaviors to replace the problem behavior...If an individual is frequently disruptive to get “things” (e.g., scores on the MAS are highest for the Tangible category), then one approach to treatment would be to teach the individual a more appropriate way to request those things he or she seems to want. Similarly, individuals engaging in attention-getting, escape-maintained, or sensory-maintained behavior could be taught to request attention, escape or assistance, or more stimulating sensory consequences, respectively...

"The results obtained from the MAS can also be used, indirectly, to provide information on things that may serve as effective reinforcers...For example, if an individual is spending a large part of the day trying to escape from tasks, then one reinforcer that can be used with this individual is escape from work! In other words, because the individual is working so hard to escape (by their problem behavior), you know that escape is something he or she really wants. You can then use escape (e.g., in the form of a break from work) as a reinforcer for working. Other options include using tangibles (e.g., activities, foods) as reinforcers for individuals who frequently engage in problem behavior for tangibles, and sensory feedback as a reinforcer for individuals with frequent self-stimulatory behavior...

"...individuals with escape-motivated problem behaviors will not respond favorably to procedures such as time-out from positive reinforcement because time-out involves the removal of attention and the removal of unpleasant demands that the individual is trying to escape--an individual doesn’t have to continue to work if he or she is in the corner. As a result, we actually see an increase in the frequency of the problem behavior when time-out is used as a response to an escape-motivated behavior..."

A Final Note from the Authors

"As you do assessments for behavior problems, keep this issue in mind. Do not assume that you have to respond to a behavior problem in the same way in every setting. It is possible that the person you work with is disruptive for several reasons. Come up with a strategy for each setting that is important, and be consistent with your strategies."